
January 18, 2008
President Bush's 2001 tax rebate eventually got mostly good reviews, even grudging praise from the Washington Post editorial board. And so it would be unsurprising if, as media reports suggest, the president now proposed that a new fiscal stimulus be administered the same way: by cutting the lowest income tax rate for the current year, then pre-paying the tax savings.
[The Tax Foundation has historically been critical of fiscal stimulus plans and retroactive tax changes. Here's our critique of Bush's 2001 tax "prebate", and here's our recent warning that stimulus now will distract the nation from needed long-term reforms.]
In May 2001, the first Bush tax cut was enacted with a fiscal stimulus built in. The lowest income tax rate, then 15%, was cut to 10% retroactively to January 2001. Then instead of waiting for taxpayers to file their 2001 tax returns at the beginning of 2002, the Treasury Department mailed out checks for the difference (5% of $6,000 for individuals equaled a $300 rebate; and 5% of $12,000 equaled a $600 rebate).
Gerald Prante has worked out the arithmetic for 2008, which comes to about $800 for individuals and $1,600 for couples. But this similar implementation won't translate into similarly good reviews for at least three reasons: