The Tax Foundation

February 25, 2008

Do State-Run Lotteries Prevent Crime?

by Alicia Hansen

Illegal lotteries, known in some parts of the country as "numbers" or "policy," have not disappeared with the re-introduction of government-run lotteries in the 20th century. Since it is difficult to measure the incidence of an illegal activity, it's hard to say to what extent state-run lotteries have rid states of illegal lotteries. (Some may argue that privately run lotteries per se are not a problem unless they lead to other crimes.)

Let's take a look at some anecdotal evidence from the pages of Lottery Post. In the past four months alone, the following headlines appeared on the Lottery Post website.  Have state-run lotteries abolished lottery-related crime? You be the judge.

People who argue that lotteries should be run and taxed heavily by the state in order to prevent crime, keep citizens from making unwise financial decisions, or prevent compulsive gambling are missing the point. Whether a potentially dangerous activity occurs illegally and clandestinely or is provided and marketed by the state, either way there will be a cretin degree of crime, financial loss, and health hazards. In fact, one could argue that the heavy marketing that accompanies state-run lotteries increases the risk of compulsive gambling.

When we dismiss the flimsy crime- and addiction-prevention justifications for state-run lotteries, we're left with only the claim that lotteries bring revenue into state coffers for worthy causes. For a refutation of this argument, see Gambling with Tax Policy: States' Growing Reliance on Lottery Tax Revenue and the Lottery and Gambling Taxes section of our website.